Band. The Hawk in Paris. (Dan Haseltine and friends Jeremy Bose and Matt Bronleewe)
Album:
Freaks
Genre: Modern/Retro synth Pop (of the highest
caliber)
Release Date: October 29, 2013
More Info and Orders:
Pledge Music
Quick Spin: For a old guy who doesn't listen to much pop-anything (even indie-art pop) I may have reformat my ear. I have now listened to this offering a couple dozen times in just three days... It's cutting grooves. Deep, melodic, infectious...it sounds at times like a soundtrack to young love... (or old love, for a man still caught in the mystery) There are some darker moments here, including (for me) a sense of disquietude. But that will take a bit to explain.
---
I find there are two ways I can listen to
Freaks. 1) Like any other offering I might hear on indie-pop radio (if such a
thing exists), or 2) As part of the ongoing sound evolution and spiritual
odyssey of Dan Haseltine (frontman for the band Jars of Clay, and now Hawk in
Paris.)
At this point I do not know if The Hawk in Paris
is just a side project, or the future for Dan and band. (Band: please forgive me for speaking of the song-craft and writing of the songs as Dan's, when the source may be shared... or yours.)
Way of Hearing # 1)
Utterly
delicious ear candy, Freaks… by The Hawk In Paris, blends the sound sensibilities
of a band like Depeche Mode, or David Bowie, or Annie Lennox and the Eurythmics (I am limited to using the folks I know) with
folks I know even less…. Like modern robo-singers Owl City or Moby. There might be better examples, but I am an
old man with an ear for Americana, so modern synth pop is a
little out of my expertise. What I do
know is that this is a very forward-looking, backward-glance. To get the idea, think of a classic building (like
the Empire State building, forged in the 1920’s -- Then think of a modern
building fashioned in the old art deco style, but with all the new technologies
and materials. In that same sense,
Freaks takes the sonic landscape of the 1980’s then updates it with all kinds
of modern sound wizardry. We get the
big spaces, the sweeping synthesizer, the Orwellian harmony, even the desire to dance like a robot…. And
all with Dan Haseltine's liquid vocals. Beyond that, The sound is sophisticated, cool, then dark.
As a pop
product, Freaks is simply stellar. The melodies shimmer with all the energy of young love. I
hear magic. And chrome, and cleanness,
and all these ambient colors of the prism.
I hear too, a gifted singer using auto tune, not to correct his
imperfections, but to lean into machine. If there is anything freaky about Freaks, it is the very idea of the
voice of man and the voice of machine twining like the twin rails of a
double helix. Dan at once sounds believably
human… .and perfect. And sorry band mates
to focus on Dan, I know your talents are there in abundance… but Dan's voice: Ambrosia.
As for
content, Freaks is given to themes common to teens, pop music and humankind. Ie. rejection, Love found. Love lapping through our dreams,. Love teetering and strained. Love in the ditch … Stars in the eyes. etc. But this is where the pop sensibilities
end. The caliber of the writing is such
that it may confuse us to call this “Pop” anything.
On a
personal note. I find this alum is written backwards. That is, I like all the first songs least,
then find my delight grows as we venture in.
(Bad for first impressions, good for glow at the end of the
voyage.) Least favorite song: Freaks. Though I very much like the spaghetti western
whistle, I still associate the word Freaks with deviants, hermaphrodites, and two-headed dogs. (Mercy for the middle.) I can hear the word “outcast, maverick, or
nerd” in a positive light, but I do not want to be found alone in the Forest of
the Freaks. (Then I am afraid it is a
way of sanctioning moral disobedience.)
Favorite
Song, which surprised me, the breakup song, Cannons. If this song is about the immediate
hemorrhaging of a very real marriage, then I am oh so very sorry. I guess the lyric which hooked my soul was
this simple confession….
If you leave me now, you leave me better than I was
before. Kind of nice to hear a
confession of love, even in the midst of unravel.
Actually
there is one more favorite song. But it
is not on this album. Turns out that
Freaks is a composite offering, with seven selections that appeared in some form on two earlier EPs.
I am trying to find the very rare first
EP (Boys and Girls), but the second - Freaks and Outcasts - is available for everyone by way of
Noisetrade. (Find it here.) I simply LOVE LOVE LOVE, the song “Dancing in
the Rain” (Outcast Mix). Dancing just
brims with all the emotions of first love; I hear a fusion of Vector’s
Dance,
with all the exuberance of the original dancing in the Rain song, --- My Fair Lady.
Ps. For those
who might buy just one song… Start with 10) Birds on a Wire.
then peck around it. (Oh, and the tune, Put your Arms around me....If I were a young pup in love, I might, listening to this melt right into the ground.
Final Note:
Name. Hawk in Paris. When doing Google search I found the name
Hawk in Paris linked to an image… actually an album cover for a work by jazz legend Coleman Hawkins. (I hate to admit it, but I was not familiar with the original Hawk, Coleman Hawkins, so now I am getting my fix on both Hawks. Listen to some from the original Hawk in Paris on
YouTube here.
or even do a
download here:
or read more on the name, the band and its development with Dan H. and the
Noise Trade Interview:
So. Final word..
Beautiful, elegant. Pulsing. Dreamy, evocative, fresh. cinematic... (actually that was seven) tempered with a sense
of dystopia.
Way of Hearing, Part 2.
I mentioned
earlier that there are two ways I can hear Freaks, first as an offering of
modern pop (For which is I give it my full star count) AND as part of the unfolding sound-scape and
spiritual pilgrimage of frontman Dan Haseltine. Here I am hearing on different level, as a
fellow traveler with Dan to the Celestial City… and wondering, if perhaps,
Freaks may well represent a side track… into the heart of the Vanity Fair.
(I think Dan will catch the allusion)
There is no
way to write this next part without sounding preachy or overreaching, and I am afraid that someone will say,
who are you to second guess, or critique anyone’s spiritual pilgrimage? (And of course, I am not qualified.) But I do know that part of what it means to
be part of living spiritual body… the body of Christ, is to encourage our
fellow pilgrims and brothers, to keep our eyes on Jesus, the author and
finisher of our faith.
When I hear Freaks, I am not sure if I am hearing
just good pop, or … something which is kind of like a grand diversion from
something ever so much more central, the love relationship at the center of
reality. And if human relationships can
ebb and flow, or even break down and wither on the vine, so too can our
relationship with the eternal groom.
It is hard
not to hear the “dystopian” vibe inside
the shimmer of Freaks. Yes there is an intoxicating celebration of love. And yes, there is
the angst that goes with parting (in whatever context), but I am also NOT
hearing something I might have heard in the earlier works of Dan, through the
mouth of his twenty year old band Jars of Clay; namely that desperate dependence on
the God who walks with us, through the brilliance and the storm.
There is
nothing here that directly proclaims a war with God. On the other hand,
the sound, the glitter, the big city slickness, even the sexual energy….in combination with the absence
of anything that references the larger romance in which we live, hints hard at
spiritual malaise. I know this may not sound fair. Should the same absence be found in the offerings of any other artist, I wouldn't think a thing about it. (In fact, I would praise them for being extra dimensional and exploring the full range of romance.) When I find that absence here where I one heard a "voice in the garden" It causes me to pause.
Am I hearing
things?
*the cover
graphics too, characterized by the loss
of face, or a mask of sky and earth, only reinforce the idea. Something is missing. Something is hid. Something is out of order in the universe.
Addendum. For a slightly different take... on the process, purpose ... even lack of agenda, see Dan's Personal Blog.
The Hawk In Paris, a Primer.